Assignment 1
SciRev- Fall 2008
Week of 9/10/08

This is
a synthesis of a few physiological theories, but it reflects the general ideas
presented in the Ibn Tufail reading.
Follow
the numered sequence, 1-5, and the arrows. This is not a circulatory system, this is a one way system,
in one end and out the other.
We will
discuss this diagram in much more detail in class.
The Story of Hayy ibn Yaqzan by Ibn Tufayl (ca. 1105-1185). IbnTuf_GoodmTran100dpiJustStory-3.6MB.pdf [This
book is out of print, so I had to do this. Sorry for the poor quality.] Ibn TufaylÕs name is also spelled, Ibn Tofail, Ibn Tofail,
and sometimes called in the West, ÒAbubacer.Ó (In Latin the letter ÒcÓ is
always hard like Òk.Ó) His full name is Abu Bakr Muhammad ibn Abd al-Malik ibn
Muhammad ibn Tufail al-Qaisi al-Andalusi, أبو
بكر
محمد
بن
عبد
الملك
بن
محمد
بن
طفيل
القيسي
الأندلسي. If you prefer to read Arabic, here is a link to the text in
its original language (or so I am told, I donÕt read Arabic):
Read pp. 3-4, skim 95-103, then the
story startsÉ read 103-166. I have
found the footnotes to this translation to be of little interest so I didnÕt
include them in this PDF. I heavily recommend that you read most if not all of
this over the weekend so you can spend time on the homework assignment and so
that you can be well prepared for a class discussion. IbnTuf_GoodmTran-JustStory-secured-3.6MB.pdf or IbnTuf_GoodmTran100dpiJustStory-3.6MB.pdf
This is the best example I have
come across that demonstrates in one reading how Aristotelianism, Neoplatonism,
and Stoicism shaped Allah/God.
It is with and against this
general model that subsequent SciRev Natural Philosophers (what we might now
refer to as ÒscientistsÓ) will be thinking and acting. Some theological and
physical particulars differ from person to person, and flavor of religion to
flavor of religion, but the path from nature to God immediately preceding the
Scientific Revolution is generally along these lines. This story essentially describes an Averroistic and
Avicenn-istic natural philosophy (see the short bio of Averro‘s below), a
philosophy that heavily influenced people such as Albertus Magnus, Thomas
Aquinas, Roger Bacon, and Robert Grosseteste in the 13th c. While Europe was in the so-called
ÒDark Ages,Ó the Islamic world was flourishing and producing tons of
interesting sciency stuff. See the
maps below to get an idea of the sphere of influence.
Aside: Here is a quote from a
literary translation of Genesis: ÒÉand wetness would well from the earth to
water all the surface of the soil, then the Lord God fashioned the human, humus
from the soil, and blew into his nostrils the breath of life, and the human
became a living creature.Ó It is
interesting to compare this with the creation of Hayy.
Read over the notes on Averro‘s
below and look at this small collection of images from MoorishSpain-1MB.pdf, in the eLibrary. The images are just to
give your mind a visual context.
Draw and write: Come up with a similar story
about a character that you may name whatever you want. Put this character in a similar
situation and have him/her discover how the world works. Just write up one or two episodes
describing a moment of exploration and discovery and contemplation. Model it on a part of the Ibn Tufayl
text. [Meaning, use Ign Tufayl for
inspiration or for stylistic ideas.]
You donÕt need to write a 70 page essay. Have your story describe how you think the world
works. You could write something
that a person in the year 2408 could use in a class on the history of
eclivomatestria. [They wonÕt use the word ÒscienceÓ in the year 2408 because it
will have been co-opted by a religion that worships Newton and the Atomic
BombÉ. I donÕt knowÉ IÕm just making this up.] The Ibn Tufayl book is a book which describes how the world
works. It is sort of a The World for
Dummys for the 12th century. Illustrate your vignettes any way you want. But I want some sort of
illustration. Have fun. Remember, if it was boring to make it
will be really boring for me to read.
Keep me interested in what you do.
Entertain and enlighten me.
Hand this in on Thursday.
Addendum: Unless your
illustrated comic is really wordy, which is entirely possible, you will
probably need to write up a separate commentary. Explain the illustrations if they are unclear and flesh out
the philosophy or the science or the ideas you present. Fill out the world view that you are
presenting. These should be
self-contained works of Òart.Ó I
should be able to give them to anyone on the street (who reads English) and
they should be able to get something from them that is reminiscent in some way
of the Ibn Tufail reading.
Averro‘s (Ibn Rushd) 1126-1198 from Moorish Spain, born in Cordoba.
Known in the West simply as "the Commentator" on Aristotle. He was a
judge and physician as well. He
had more influence on Christian philosophers than Islamic ones. He knew Ibn Tufail personally.
Trivia: He is encountered in
Limbo by Dante (Inferno Canto 4) along with Euclid, Galen, Hippocrates,
Aristotle, Avicenna, PlatoÉetc.
He proposed that God thinking of
himself is His relationship to the world. [Think about this statement.]
Passive Intelligence is
immaterial, eternal, and universal and when actualized, it is one for all menÉ
thus immortality not particular.
(IÕll discuss this in class.)
Much like Al-Farabi, an earlier
Islamic philosopher (d. 950), he considered philosophy to be superior to theology,
which he felt relied on metaphor and picturesque language to describe the
workings of God. Theology was
useful for ordinary, uneducated people, but philosophers were capable of
understanding a higher truth. This
idea, of course, does not play well with theologians, but it sure was
attractive to the sciency types.
The first cause is
self-evident. There must be an
unmoved moverÉ Allah/God, meaning that our world had to start at some point,
and the starter, the one who need no starting, we shall call God.
The main purpose of man is to
become like God. [This idea is
also from Al-Farabi, but is particularly poignant for our reading of Ibn
Tufail.] Think about this. How do we become like God? What do we need to do or think or make?
13th C. Christian myth of
Averro‘s [This myth tended to give
him a negative image amongst Christian theologians, who, none-the-less studied
him intently.]
Averro‘s actually proposed..
Averro‘s was well aware that the
individual person should have an individual soul/form after death. He did not want to promote a
collective, undifferentiated soul theory as this would go against scripture.
But, according to his reading of Aristotle, it is matter and only matter that
gives form individual existence.
Without matter, forms are universals and cannot exist in plural. Put another way, identical forms
without material existence cannot exist as separate forms, they exist as one universal
form. There is only one idea of
chair but there are many examples of material chairs. The problem as Averro‘s saw it, was that the human soul
after death was a form without matter and would thus have no individuality, it
would just be a universal human form.
His solution was to claim that individuality was maintained in a very
subtle matter, Òthe animal warmth which emanates from the heavenly
bodies.Ó* He suggested that the
soul discarded the dead earthly body and informed this celestial stuff,
preserving its material individuality which would otherwise be lost upon
death. [I cannot help but think
that this celestial stuff is aether/quintessence/5th-element/spiritus-like
stuff.] This is confusing metaphysics.
I am confused and I have yet to read anybody who explains it very well
or very confidently. But this
short description should at least give you the idea that Averro‘s took
Aristotle very seriously and that his philosophy is very sophisticated.
*See Averro‘s, Averro‘sÕ Tahafut
al-Falasifah, trans. A. Kamali, Lahore 1958, p. 357. This text was not available in Latin in
the 13th c.
Selected
works:
The sources used for this
thumbnail sketch of Averro‘s
Hyman, Arthur, and James J.
Walsh. Philosophy
in the Middle Ages; the Christian, Islamic, and Jewish Traditions. New
York,: Harper & Row, 1967, pp.
281-325.
Lindberg, David C. Theories of
Vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.
Lindberg, David C. The Beginnings of
Western Science : The European Scientific Tradition in Philosophical,
Religious, and Institutional Context, 600 B.C. To A.D. 1450. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, 1992.
Lindberg, David C.
"Medieval Science and Its Religious Context." Osiris 10, no. Constructing Knowledge in
the History of Science (1995): 60-79.
Weinberg, Julius R. A Short History
of Medieval Philosophy. Princeton, N.J.,: Princeton University Press,
1974. See especially pp. 127-139.
Themes
that were debated in the Middle Ages and played prominent roles in the
Scientific Revolution:
Start
thinking about
what sort of project you would like to work on. I will be heavily involved in this decision, so donÕt feel
like you need to pick something out of thin air. I will probably help you put together an initial
bibliography and guide you into a topic that I need to have covered in class.
If you have your heart set on something in particular, let me know what it is
so that I can think it over and figure out how it will fit into class.
Here is the extent of Islamic
rule as of the 8th c.
It was huge.
(I added a bit to the north of
this map so that it could be compared to the next map.)

For comparison, here is the
Roman Empire at its largest.

Interesting Science News
–If
you run across an interesting story, let me know–
Wald-
ÒWind Energy Bumps Into Power GridÕs LimitsÓ
Longer
extension cords needed to get to remote wind and solar power generators.
Review Posted 10/10/08
Galenic_Heart-etc-Review-4.4MB.pdf
(this is the same one that I posted on Week 0.)
Ibn_Tufayl_Hayy-review-1.4MB.pdf
Back to
Syllabus [SciRevF08].